ACSME 2016 conference poster – Enhancing Science students’ engagement in flipped learning

Flipped learning is a type of blended learning where students are first introduced to new content online prior to class, and more student-centred active learning occurs during the face-to-face class. Despite the advantages of flipped learning, many academics are unsure of how to design and implement flipped learning activities in their curriculum. In addition, students often have difficulty adopting this more independent and active approach to learning because they are used to traditional transmission approaches.

I am currently leading a UTS Learning and Teaching Grant to address these issues in the Faculty of Science. The project is titled ‘Enhancing student and teacher engagement in flipped learning across undergraduate Science using the Flipped Teacher and Flipped Learner Framework’. My team and I have been working closely with subject coordinators to implement flipped learning activities using the Framework to address threshold concepts, field-trip preparation, key concepts for workshops and practical classes, and a complete flip in one subject to online interactive lectures with collaborative workshops. We’ve had a great start to the project where we implemented flipped learning using the Framework in two first year and two second year Science subjects.

I recently presented our first set of results at the annual Australian Conference for Science and Mathematics Education (ACSME) held at the University of Queensland in September, 2016. 


I really enjoyed the poster session at ACSME this year. It was a great opportunity to talk to enthusiastic STEM educators and share ideas (photo by G. Lawrie, ACSME 2016).

You can download a PDF of our 2016 ACSME poster and the Flipped Teacher and Flipped Learner Framework here

You can download a copy of the abstract as it appears in the conference proceedings here.

Title: Enhancing engagement in flipped learning across undergraduate Science using the Flipped Teacher and Flipped Learner Framework

Authors: Yvonne C. Davila, Jorge Reyna, Elaine Huber, Peter Meier

Conference: ACSME 2016 (Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education), University of Queensland, Brisbane, 28 to 30 September, 2016. Theme: The 21st Century Science and Maths Graduate: What is the place of our STEM graduates in the world? How do we prepare them?


Background – The flipped classroom describes one approach to blended learning in which new instructional content is delivered online prior to class, making time for more student-centred active learning during the face-to-face class. Despite the advantages of a flipped classroom approach, such as flexibility, more time for students to consolidate ideas, and more opportunities for collaborative learning and reflection (Kim, Kim, Khera & Getman, 2014), flipped classrooms are still under-researched and under-evaluated (Abeysekera & Dawson, 2015). Many academics are unsure of how to implement flipped classrooms and students often have difficulty adopting this approach to learning because they are used to traditional transmission approaches (Chen, Wang & Chen, 2014).

Aims – To facilitate more student-centred blended learning in our faculty, we aimed to:

  1. Use the “Flipped Teacher and Flipped Learner Framework” (Reyna, Huber & Davila, 2015) to design, implement, communicate and evaluate flipped learning activities in undergraduate Science subjects; and
  2. Build students’ understanding of the advantages of the flipped classroom model in order to improve their overall engagement and approach to learning.

Description of intervention – The Flipped Teacher and Flipped Learner Framework (Reyna et al., 2015; illustrated below) identifies seven elements that are influential to implementing a flipped learning activity. Using this framework, flipped learning activities have been integrated into the Science curricula.


Design and methods – In 2016, the Framework was applied in a first year and a second year subject. A mixed methods approach (Creswell & Plano-Clark, 2011) was used to evaluate the efficacy of the Framework, particularly the role of communication (element 6) of the benefits of flipped learning to students and academics. Student completion of pre-class online tasks was tracked through the learning management system. Within each subject, questionnaires were used to evaluate student experiences of flipped learning. Where applicable, student academic performance relating to flipped activities was evaluated.

Results – Preliminary data analyses indicate that the majority of students completed their online pre-class activities (e.g. >90% in the first year subject, n = 751 students). In the questionnaires, the majority of students in both subjects reported that they understood the benefits for their learning of completing online pre-work prior to face-to-face classes. Furthermore, the majority of students in the second year subject reported that the flipped classroom approach enhanced their learning.

Conclusions – Our early results indicate that communicating to students and academics the rationale for using a flipped classroom approach is key to successful implementation of the flipped classroom model. Further testing of the framework in other subjects across the science degree will advance our understanding of the impacts of and best practice for flipped classrooms in Science higher education.


Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development34(1), 1-14.
Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N.S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead?. Computers & Education79, 16-27.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Kim, M.K., Kim, S.M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: an exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education22, 37-50.
Reyna J, Huber E, Davila YC (2015) Designing your Flipped Classroom: an evidence-based framework to guide the Flipped Teacher and the Flipped Learner. The 12th Annual Conference of the International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, RMIT Melbourne, 27th to 30th October, 2015, pages 91-92.


This abstract appears in: Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education, The University of Queensland, Sept 28th to 30th, 2016, pages 40-41, ISBN Number 978-0-9871834-4-6.


EdMedia 2016 conference paper: Enhancing the Flipped Classroom Experience with the Aid of Inclusive Design

I am very excited to share this paper that I coauthored with Jorge Reyna and Peter Meier (UTS), which has won a Most Outstanding Paper prize at the recent EdMedia 2016 conference, Vancouver, Canada. 

Title: Enhancing the Flipped Classroom Experience with the Aid of Inclusive Design

Authors: Jorge Reyna, Yvonne C. Davila, Peter Meier

Conference: EdMedia 2016 – World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, Vancouver, BC, Canada: June 28-30, 2016, Sheraton Vancouver Wall Centre Hotel

Abstract: Flipped classrooms are increasingly used in tertiary institutions to engage students in active learning tasks and foster independent learning skills. The use of technology such as digital video, screencasts and interactive presentations is impacting the design of flipped classrooms. This creates an opportunity to apply the principles of Inclusive Design in the planning, development and deployment of resources used to flip the classroom. The aim of this paper is to discuss the integration of Inclusive Design into Flipped Classroom interventions to cater for a wider range of learners. For this purpose, we reviewed the pedagogical foundations of Flipped Classrooms, the advantages and disadvantages of its implementation, and discuss Inclusive Design enablers.

“The flipped classroom approach is defined as a type of blended learning approach that moves new instructional content online which is accessed prior to class, making way for more student-centred learning in class. With this change comes a shift from teacher-focused transmission to student-centred active learning in the classroom …We have identified five inclusive design enablers that can impact learner experiences in a flipped classroom”


Flipped Teacher and Flipped Learner Framework (Reyna, Davila and Huber 2015)

Reference: Reyna, J., Davila, Y. C., & Meier, P. (2016). ‘Enhancing the Flipped Classroom Experience with the Aid of Inclusive Design’. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, Vol. 2016, No. 1, pp. 1789-1801. Retrieved from

Want to know more about flipped classrooms? Read about our Flipped Teacher and Flipped Learner Framework here.



Supporting the development of professional skills in scientific writing – 2014 UTS T&L forum

My colleagues, Andy Leigh and Neela Griffiths, and I were chosen to present our work at the 2014 UTS Teaching and Learning Forum. The forum was held on 12 and 13 November, and provided an opportunity for the sharing of ideas and innovations in learning and teaching at UTS. Our work was funded by a 2014 UTS Vice Chancellor’s Learning and Teaching grant and a 2014 UTS First Year Experience Grant.

Slide01Scientific writing is a fundamental skill for scientists to communicate effectively to the scientific and wider community. Responding to a need to embed the development of paraphrasing and referencing skills early in the science curriculum, online interactive learning resources were designed for a large (>650 students) core first year environmental science subject. Using the flipped learning approach, the online pre-class activities were partnered with a redesigned face-to-face tutorial, which incorporated peer-to-peer and teacher-to-peer interaction. Prior to this initiative, students received a mini lecture on referencing standards, with no opportunity to practice referencing and paraphrasing prior to their major assessment (scientific report).

The aims of this project were to:

  1. Increase student engagement with the ‘Professional skills’ Graduate Attribute,
  2. Improve students’ approach to using current online technology to effectively find peer-reviewed articles for use in scientific writing, and
  3. Build student understanding of what constitutes plagiarism and academic integrity in the scientific discipline, and how these relate to being a professional scientist.

By addressing these aims, we hoped to achieve the following outcomes:

  1. Develop student confidence in using and citing the primary literature correctly for successful scientific writing, and
  2. Improve student skills in paraphrasing for the scientific discipline and correctly citing the scientific literature.

Slide08Although the online activities were not worth any marks, most students completed the online interactive tutorial on paraphrasing prior to class. A feature of the interactive tutorial included immediate feedback on quiz answers and the option to review or retake the tutorial. We received positive feedback about the online resources and the redesigned face-to-face collaborative tutorial from our students:



Students indicated that the opportunity to practice referencing and paraphrasing skills in class before writing their major scientific report was very beneficial. Students also consulted the online resources repeatedly when writing up their reports indicating that the discipline-specific resources were a valuable inclusion. Students also agreed that they could see the link between the skills developed in the tutorials and graduate attributes.

Our plan is to refine the online resources and in class paraphrasing activity based on feedback from our students and teaching associates, and we will continue to develop the resources to support the development of scientific writing skills in first year.

Presentation details:

Title: Supporting the development of professional skills in scientific writing: an embedded, flipped and interactive approach to citing and paraphrasing the scientific literature

Authors: Yvonne Davila, Neela Griffiths, Andy Leigh

Keywords: academic integrity, scientific writing, flipped learning, professional skills, Science, first year, referencing, avoiding plagiarism

Date presented: 12 November 2014

Forum: UTS Teaching and Learning Forum 2014